INK TO BRICK vs FloorPlan API: editable models or data
FloorPlan API targets extraction for software applications. INK TO BRICK supports reviewing and developing an editable project. Choose around the next task: consuming data or correcting and presenting a space.[1][3]
Where each one fits
Task by task
See the editing workflow
For an API or model-file workflow, compare the review interface as well as the file. These captures show the expert tools and linked plan/3D views on the authored sample duplex. Imported geometry needs a separate check of which objects and controls remain editable.
The demonstrations use native elements in the sample duplex authored in INK TO BRICK.
The editor at a glance
The top bar, the nine side tabs, the view toolbars, the bottom toolbar, the inspector and the command palette.

Views and screenshots
Switch between plan, 3D and split, change how walls and levels show, preview and walk through the home, and save a picture of the view.

Choose by the next operation
If your application needs room polygons or extracted geometry, evaluate the API schema and access. If you need to correct an opening, compare furniture and share a version, test those editor tasks before choosing.
Images and review scope
The illustrated article includes the public demo screenshot and an INK TO BRICK editor view. It records what we observed and what we did not test. The images show different workflows; they do not establish an accuracy ranking.[6]
Sources and scope
The cited vendor pages support the capability comparison. Any direct demo observation is identified in the article; this is not a matched-source accuracy benchmark. Product details can change. Unavailable sources are identified, and older claims are not treated as current limitations. Check the linked plan, price and export details.