INK TO BRICK vs MY3DPLANNER: interior sales planning and custom catalogs

MY3DPLANNER combines manual interior planning with visual and catalog features. Compare it around client selection and business integration, then separately establish how an existing source plan enters the project.[1][5]

INK TO BRICKReviewed October 7, 2026

Choose INK TO BRICK if

Continue from a supplied drawing or supported model, inspect spatial views and correct native elements or imported objects in an ongoing project.[2][3]

Choose MY3DPLANNER if

Interior-sales workflows, custom furniture from photos and white-label integration.[1]

Task by task

Your taskINK TO BRICKMY3DPLANNER

Access and cost scopeYour first floor is built in 3D free. Pay to edit it; saving and downloads follow the paid-floor or subscription terms on pricing.[4]The site advertises an evaluation at no charge; professional scope is available by arrangement.[1]

Input and starting pointStart from supported drawings, IFC or mesh files; check the import path before uploading.[2]Draw rooms, apartments or houses in a browser.[1]

Editing and interactionChat and Expert controls work on the same project. Native elements and imported objects expose different editing controls.[3][2]Furnishing and finishes use a customizable library.[1]

Views and reviewInspect the plan and spatial views of the project; keep the source drawing available as reconstruction reference.[3]Documents 2D/3D planning and generative photorealistic images.[1]

Preservation and recoverySave accepted changes and compare alternatives; verify the source dimensions and openings after each architectural correction.[3]Check a dimensioned furniture change in the plan before judging its generated render.[1]

Export and integrationBasic paid-floor delivery includes GLB and PNG/PDF; professional CAD formats depend on the plan. Check imported-object behavior in the recipient tool.[4][2]Advertises photo-to-furniture models and business/white-label integration.[1]

See the editing workflow

For an interior proposal, compare the furniture footprint and the surface you can actually change. The chair placement loop and material selection below show those two operations in the INK TO BRICK editor.

The demonstrations use native elements in the sample duplex authored in INK TO BRICK.

Placing and arranging

Place, turn, select, move, copy and delete pieces, and build kitchen runs and shelves along a wall.

A mid-century lounge chair picked from the furniture list rides the cursor across the duplex’s living room in 3D, with distance guides to the walls, outlined red where the spot is taken and green where it fits, while the placement card shows the chosen chair, the rotation keys and Cancel placement. — Pick a piece and it follows the cursor; click to place it.

See the steps in the manual

Paint and finishes

Paint walls, floors and furniture from the material library, make your own materials, and apply catalog finishes to a room or the whole home.

Paint mode with Soft White selected in the material library and a wall beside the duplex’s kitchen outlined under the cursor. — The surface under the cursor is the one the next click paints.

See the steps in the manual

Catalog fidelity matters for a sales proposal

Choose one recognizable product with known dimensions. Check the generated asset from front and side, then place it near a doorway. Separate a useful visual resemblance from a product model suitable for dimensioned coordination; photographs alone do not establish the missing depth.

Model edits and generated images should tell the same story

Change a finish without moving furniture, then compare the plan, the 3D project and the generated image. Ask which artifact a client can revisit after approval. INK TO BRICK offers the alternative of developing a supplied drawing or supported model in an ongoing project.[2][3]

Choose by sales integration or source continuation

Shortlist MY3DPLANNER when a furniture or kitchen business needs its catalog in a client presentation. Confirm the actual export format and integration agreement. This is a public-page review, without a custom catalog, authenticated editor or white-label deployment test.

Sources and scope

The cited vendor pages support the capability comparison. Any direct demo observation is identified in the article; this is not a matched-source accuracy benchmark. Product details can change. Unavailable sources are identified, and older claims are not treated as current limitations. Check the linked plan, price and export details.